Preserve testimony
Keep witness statements connected to their original sources, dates, locators and later appearances.
An independent research observatory preserving witness testimony, reconstructing encounter histories, and making the source record easier to inspect.
Decades of Sasquatch material are scattered across interviews, newspapers, podcasts, books, public databases, historical collections and private research. As stories are repeated, the source of a claim—and when it first appeared—can become difficult to see.
The Observatory exists to preserve that source history. We separate witnesses from hosts and commentators, events from later retellings, and original testimony from interpretation so the record can be examined rather than merely repeated.
A well-organized archive allows readers to ask better questions: Which details appear in the earliest account? Which emerge later? Are co-witnesses independently sourced? Do descriptions recur across eras? What evidence survives outside the story itself?
An independent research project developed and maintained by Grassroots Consulting.
Keep witness statements connected to their original sources, dates, locators and later appearances.
Separate witnesses, events, media, evidence and later interpretation instead of blending them into one story.
Look across historical and modern material for recurring traits, differences, chronology changes and unresolved questions.
Turn meaningful discoveries into accessible articles while keeping the supporting research visible and limitations explicit.
The Observatory is for curious readers, researchers, journalists, historians, investigators and anyone who wants to examine the Sasquatch record more carefully. You do not need to accept a conclusion before exploring the evidence.
Encounter-level records connecting witnesses, chronology, sources, media and evidence.
Explore cases →Witness profiles preserving appearances, reported encounters and changes in testimony over time.
Explore witnesses →Browse witness and case records by state and province while preserving the original location wording.
Explore locations →Reader-facing findings, investigations and historical features produced from the Observatory research record.
Read publications →Methods, source records, evidence, media and the analytical work behind the public reporting.
Explore research →New source-linked public profile from a direct transcribed Bigfoot Eyewitness Radio interview connected to North Idaho / HooDoo Mountain area.
View witness →New source-linked public profile from a direct transcribed My Bigfoot Sighting interview connected to Arkansas Ozarks.
View witness →New source-linked public profile from a direct transcribed My Bigfoot Sighting interview connected to Arkansas Ozarks.
View witness →A distinct My Bigfoot Sighting interview has been added to Messer’s source chronology. A detected difference remains unresolved and is not treated as a contradiction.
View witness →Recovered interviews, archival recordings, films and documents are connected directly to the witnesses and cases they document. Media is contextualized rather than presented as automatic proof.

Tate Hieronymus / Bluff Creek Project
Video associated with this witness record. Source access is preserved separately from evidentiary assessment.
Open original source ↗
The Sasquatch Archives
Audio / video associated with this witness record. Source access is preserved separately from evidentiary assessment.
Open original source ↗Sasquatch Chronicles / archival recording
Audio associated with this witness record. Source access is preserved separately from evidentiary assessment.
Open original source ↗Separate what the historical record establishes about the Patterson–Gimlin event from the claims that remain disputed.
Open case →An event-level comparison tests whether specific traits recur across two very different testimony eras.
Read finding →See why the Observatory preserves earliest sources and later retellings as a chronology instead of flattening them into one account.
Read investigation →The Observatory does not begin with the assumption that Sasquatch exists—or that every report has a conventional explanation. Its purpose is to preserve the record well enough that better questions can be asked.