Historical case

Bluff Creek / Patterson–Gimlin Film — 1967

Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin reported encountering a large upright hair-covered figure at Bluff Creek, where Patterson filmed the retreating subject on 16mm color film.

The encounter

On October 20, 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin reported encountering a large upright hair-covered figure at Bluff Creek in northern California while traveling on horseback. Patterson filmed the retreating subject on 16mm color film, creating the artifact now known as the Patterson–Gimlin film.

The film's existence is not disputed; the identity of the filmed subject remains unresolved. Patterson and Gimlin gave early accounts of the event, including a radio interview recorded six days later. Later decades produced extensive technical analysis, skeptical criticism, claims of a human performer and costume, and continuing debate over scale, gait, anatomy and film provenance.

The case is therefore best understood as several evidence layers rather than one binary authenticity question: the surviving film, the witnesses' testimony, contemporary reporting, later technical analyses, and later hoax claims each have their own provenance and limitations. None of those layers alone establishes what the subject was.

At a glance

Date
October 20, 1967
Location
Bluff Creek, northern California
Witnesses
Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin
Observation
Filmed encounter
Media
16mm color film
Identity
Unresolved

What was reported

  • Large upright hair-covered figure reported retreating across creek bed
  • Patterson filmed the subject while Gimlin remained a co-witness
  • Six-day-post-event radio testimony survives
  • Film is a genuine historical media artifact; subject identity remains disputed

Witnesses

Evidence & corroboration

  • The 16mm film is the central physical/media artifact.
  • Contemporary press and early audio testimony preserve near-event chronology.
  • No specimen, DNA, body or independently verified biological sample is tied to the encounter.
  • Later hoax claims and technical analyses remain disputed and are evaluated as separate source layers.

Sources & media

9 additional source items are indexed in the Observatory media archive. Browse the media archive →

Research assessment

The 16mm film, contemporary reporting and early audio testimony provide an unusually rich near-event record. No specimen, DNA, body or independently verified biological sample is tied to the encounter, and later hoax claims and technical analyses remain disputed.

Connected record

Case dossier

This section assembles only relationships explicitly preserved in the Observatory’s canonical research graph. Its presence does not change evidence grade or verification status.

Witness roster

Related media

Evidence boundary

Relationship assembly is not corroboration. Each witness statement, media source, and unresolved claim retains its own provenance and evidentiary limits.