Historical case

Mica Mountain — 1955

William Roe reported a close visual encounter near Mica Mountain in British Columbia; a sworn statement made in 1957 remains the principal documentary anchor.

The encounter

In 1955, William Roe reported a close visual encounter near Mica Mountain in British Columbia, in the Tête Jaune Cache region. The case is anchored by a sworn statement made in 1957, giving the account unusual chronological value compared with stories preserved only through much later interviews.

In that statement Roe described a broad, straight torso, arms reaching nearly to the knees, a short thick neck and an upright gait in which the foot was placed heel first. These morphology details are significant to the archive because they were recorded early rather than being reconstructed after decades of Bigfoot popular culture.

Roe was the sole primary witness in the current record, and the public source now available is a later web reproduction of the sworn statement. No independent co-witness is represented. The case therefore rests heavily on the provenance and content of Roe's own early account.

At a glance

Date
1955
Location
Mica Mountain / Tête Jaune Cache region, British Columbia
Witnesses
William Roe
Observation
Close visual encounter
Key record
1957 sworn statement
Witness count
Single primary witness

What was reported

  • Broad straight torso
  • Long arms reaching nearly to knees
  • Heel-first gait
  • Short, thick neck
  • Upright locomotion

Witnesses

Evidence & corroboration

  • No independent co-witness statement is represented.
  • The present public source is a later reproduction of the sworn account.
  • The early sworn statement is the principal documentary anchor.

Sources & media

Research assessment

Roe’s 1957 sworn statement is the principal documentary anchor and preserves a relatively early account of the reported 1955 encounter. No independent co-witness statement is represented, and the current public source is a later reproduction of that sworn account.

Connected record

Case dossier

This section assembles only relationships explicitly preserved in the Observatory’s canonical research graph. Its presence does not change evidence grade or verification status.

Witness roster

Related media

Evidence boundary

Relationship assembly is not corroboration. Each witness statement, media source, and unresolved claim retains its own provenance and evidentiary limits.